![]() |
Disclaimer & |
Before or after they become readers of this group of pages, persons have no right to say that the writer has a debt to anyone and they have no power to put the writer in debt to anyone.
The writer of this group of pages makes a free offer of his ideas to the public. In making this offer, it is his purpose to give an account of his knowledge. Two things are the opposite of the writer's purpose: first, to give out expert opinions or suggestions and, second, to give readers hope, by clear words or by suggestion, that his ideas are true, are complete, are good for some use, or are facts of science.
No persons have a right to say that the writer is responsible for making his ideas true, complete or good for some use. In addition, no persons have a right to say that the writer is responsible for keeping readers or other persons safe from danger, pain, damage and death.
If readers make a decision to put any of the writer's ideas to use, then these readers become fully responsible for making this decision and acting in this way. And the writer has no debt to readers or other persons if they get a bad outcome from decisions and acts based on his ideas.
If readers or their loved ones have a serious disease of the body or of the mind, they had better see a caregiver who is working near the place where they are living. It is impossible for this group of pages to take the place of, or to be more important than, expert and in-person care.
The writer of these pages gives out connections to the opinions, statements, suggestions and knowledge of other persons. The writer is not necessarily in agreement with this outside material and he does not give it his approval. In addition, this outside material is presented "as is" and not as true or complete or good for some use or facts of science. If readers make use of this outside material for themselves or for a loved one, they are fully responsible for their decision and acts as well as any danger, pain, damage or death which may come about from such use.
Lastly, presenting his own and outsiders' ideas in these pages does not make the writer have a connection to, or become a guide or helper or manager of, readers who make use of those ideas to take care of themselves or other persons, even when readers get money in exchange for doing so.
On this page, the one word "autism" takes the place of the more complex "autism spectrum disorder" and its short form "ASD."
Like the wise men of old,
we have a child to find.
THE CHIEF OPERATION FOR MAKING AUTISM BETTER
Everyone in the family has to be or become a communicator with respect to deep feelings. The autistic boy or girl is the last person in the family to become a communicator. One becomes a communicator through deep-feeling contact. The operation of deep-feeling contact has to be done only once for each noncommunicative person in the family.
THE CHIEF PROCESS FOR MAKING AUTISM BETTER
Like all diseases of the mind and some diseases of the body, autism has, as its heart, the ongoing act of keeping one's conscious attention away from difficult deep feelings. After some time, this ongoing act becomes an automatic behavior (that is, a habit). This automatic behavior (namely, no conscious attention given to difficult deep feelings) is almost never questioned and is taken as a natural and normal part of living. For autism to get better, everyone's conscious attention has to be kept on deep feelings, mostly the difficult ones (such as pain) and sometimes the consoling ones (such as aloneness). This is hard work which has to go on all the time.
![[whole tee]](graphics/teeall.png)
Here are the three steps for putting together a "TEE" or Tender Emotional Environment:
Step 1--The Base of the "TEE":Here the unit of interest is the autistic person's family.
For our purposes here, the family is made up of
Everyone in the family has to be a communicator or has to become a communicator with respect to deep feelings. Why do we have to have all communicators and no noncommunicators around the autistic person? We never let noncommunicators come near the autistic person because they automatically put up a fight against deep feeling in themselves and in anyone nearby. And their automatic fight goes against our chief work, which is helping the autistic person get in touch with his or her deep feelings. With noncommunicators present, "emerging feeling states will be met with disgust, disdain, disinterest, alarm, hostility, withdrawal, exploitation and the like. . . ." This list of great words comes from Stolorow's book. (Stolorow et al pp 13-14)
Step 2--the Stem of the "TEE":Keeping your attention on deep feelings is hard work for a number of reasons:
Step 3--the Top of the "TEE":Trance is another name for hypnosis and, especially in autism, for self-hypnosis. At the heart of trance are three acts:
Please take note that sleep is not a necessary part of trance.
So a war on trances is made up of three acts:
DANGER!
If you make war on trances before the autistic person becomes a communicator, then you are putting him or her through cruel and unnecessary punishment. The war on trances has to come after deep-feeling contact with the autistic person.
Making war on trances is likely to get the entranced person very angry. This anger has no value but does keep the trance going. Our purpose here is to get to the deep feeling that is being covered up by the trance and the anger.
Why Go to the TroubleWhat would make you do all the hard work of Learning Deep Feelings? Very simply, a broken heart.
And how does your heart get broken? By seeing that your bright and beautiful child, your own flesh and blood, the best of you, is lost and living in relentless terror and unspeakable horror from which the child gets some distance through trances that make the child "numb and dumb" and keep him or her from fully taking part in society.
I will have to have help with four things:
Every noncommunicative person in the family (as outlined above) has to make the agreement that he or she will undergo deep-feeling contact so that he or she becomes a communicator with respect to deep feelings. Deep-feeling contact with the autistic person will be done last, after all the other noncommunicative persons in the family have been contacted. That way, if a family member goes back on his or her word to undergo deep-feeling contact, then I will put an end to my work with the family, I will not make deep-feeling contact with the autistic child and the child will not be in danger from persons in the family who are unwilling to take part fully in the care of the autistic child. Certainly, the child's autism will be unchanged.
The University will have to have an expert, or group of experts, oversee my work with the autistic children and their families. My experience with autism is so limited that I have a need for guides and helpers every step of the way. All of my work with the autistic children and their families will be recorded on videotape.
Because deep-feeling contact with a person more than six weeks old is not a natural or normal event, my work is clearly experimental. From years of experience, I know what takes place after deep-feeling contact with men and women and with normal children. But I have no idea what might take place after deep-feeling contact with an autistic person. That makes deep-feeling contact with an autistic person an experiment, which has to be looked over and judged to have value by an ethics committee.
I would have to be covered under the University's malpractice liability insurance. Because I will be doing an experimental operation, namely deep-feeling contact, private malpractice liability insurance would have a very high price, amounting to more money than I have.
Was Dr. Leo Kanner a native communicator with respect to deep emotion? Maybe so. His being a native communicator would explain the title of his seminal paper on autism, "Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact." If I could see a good many photographs of Dr. Kanner or, better yet, a movie of him, then I might be able figure out if he was a communicator or a noncommunicator.
Which is harder to make better, regular autism or Asperger's Disorder? At this time, it is my belief that Asperger's Disorder will be harder to make better. In Asperger's Disorder, the chief way to keep conscious attention away from deep feelings is thought. In regular autism, the chief way to keep conscious attention away from deep feelings is trance. To me, it is easier to put a stop to trance than to put a stop to thought. So it is likely that regular autism is made better more easily than Asperger's Disorder.
Will we be able to keep autism from taking place? In other words, will we be able to prevent autism? I am certain that prevention will be possible in the future. To put a stop to autism, a large group of persons would have to be trained in helping mothers to make deep-feeling contact with their babies in the first six weeks after birth. Then, shortly after birth, deep-feeling contact would prevent autism much like antibiotics (such as silver nitrate and penicillin) prevent gonorrheal eye infection.
|
|
|